Legal Opinion

Bakerville Lumber & Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 13, 1995No. 13418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the trial court affirming the defendant’s denial of the plaintiff’s application to extend an existing renewable special permit for earth excavation. At the time of the oral argument of this appeal, the defendant claimed that the plaintiff’s appeal was moot because all of the special permits issued by the defendant to the plaintiff had expired. The plaintiff concedes that the permits have expired.

*213“It is a well-settled general rule that the existence of an actual controversy is an essential requisite to appellate jurisdiction; it is not the province of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kurahara & Morrissey v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Grace Community Church v. Town of BethelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Papagorgiou v. AnastopoulousConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Madigan v. MadiganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Sherman v. ShermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. In re Catrina L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. B D Assoc. v. Zba of North Stonington, No. Cv 94 053 13 30 (Oct. 22, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API