Legal Opinion
Madigan v. Madigan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 14, 1993No. 11051PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Madigan v. Madigan, 224 Conn. 749, 620 A.2d 1276 (1993). When the matter was originally before us, we dismissed the appeal, sua sponte, concluding that an order of temporary custody and certain other pendente lite orders, did not constitute a final appealable judgment. Upon the granting of certification, the Supreme Court reversed our decision, concluding that the granting of a motion for temporary custody of minor children in a dissolution proceeding is immediately appealable. Id., 757.
Certain facts are necessary to a resolution of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Madigan v. MadiganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sobocinski v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Simes v. SimesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Bakerville Lumber & Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Thorn Americas, Inc. v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994