Legal Opinion

Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 2004No. 16-01-19121; A118530PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant Emerald People’s Utility District (Emerald) appeals from a summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. ORS 28.010. The trial court held that plaintiff Springfield Utility Board (the board), acting on behalf of the city of Springfield (the city), 1 has the authority to exclude Emerald from providing electrical service to an area that the city annexed (the area in dispute). Most of the area in dispute is within Emerald’s boundaries and its allocated service territory; the rest is subject to Emerald’s application to add it to Emerald’s allocated service territoiy. 2 We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BD. v. Emerald PUDOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. LindquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API