Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility District
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.
At issue in this declaratory judgment action is whether a city possesses authority to exclude a people’s utility district (PUD) from providing electrical services in an area newly annexed to the city when the Public Utility Commission of Oregon (PUC)1 previously had allocated that area to the PUD as part of the PUD’s exclusive service territory. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that a city does not possess such authority.
Springfield Utility Board (the board), acting on behalf of the City of Springfield (the city), adopted an ordinance that purported to exclude Emerald People’s Utility…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BD. v. Emerald PUDOregon Supreme Court · 2005