State v. Lindquist
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the probation revocation proceeding. We affirm.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of felon in possession of a firearm. On November 14, 1997, he was sentenced to 36 months’ probation for that offense. Thus, defendant’s probation was scheduled to expire in November 2000. After an initial meeting with his probation officer, in which defendant provided his home address in Veneta, defendant allegedly failed to meet with the probation officer as required by the terms…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LudwigOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. EckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. StuveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BerglundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. VanlieuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012