Legal Opinion
Denmon v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OriNiON by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell,
Plaintiffs sued defendant in trespass. The jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed to this Court from an Order of the lower Court which dismissed their motion for a new trial.
As stated in the footnote in Mengo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224, 186 A. 2d 9:
“Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 384 Pa. 335, 121 A. 2d 84. Compare also Hazle Township…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Menyo v. SpharSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Hazle Township Supervisors' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- DENMAN v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Lynch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- O'DONNELL v. BachelorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Gelzhiser v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.