Legal Opinion

Denmon v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OriNiON by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiffs sued defendant in trespass. The jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed to this Court from an Order of the lower Court which dismissed their motion for a new trial.

As stated in the footnote in Mengo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224, 186 A. 2d 9:

“Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 384 Pa. 335, 121 A. 2d 84. Compare also Hazle Township…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Menyo v. SpharSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Hazle Township Supervisors' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DENMAN v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Lynch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. O'DONNELL v. BachelorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Gelzhiser v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API