Marvin Vending Corp. v. Bieber

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This was an action in assumpsit for an alleged breach of a vending machine contract. After a trial, the plaintiff obtained a verdict of 13,00o.1 The defendants filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. The court below entered the following order: “And Now, this 10th day of June, 1965, after oral argument before the Court en banc and upon consid*250eration of; the brief filed, the motions for a new trial1 and judgment non obstante veredicto áre refused.” The defendants then appealed to this Court.

The record shows that there wás no judgment entered on the verdict…