Legal Opinion

Bull & Bear Group, Inc. v. Fuller

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 17, 1992No. 91 Civ. 4802 (PKL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge,

In this action, plaintiff, Bull & Bear Group, Inc. and counterclaim defendant Bassett S. Winmill (collectively “Bull & Bear”), now move the Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for an order, pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976), abstaining from the exercise of jurisdiction and remanding this action to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. Defendant/counterclaim plaintiff James W. Fuller (“Fuller”)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. F.H. Krear & Co. v. Nineteen Named TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cargo Partner AG v. Albatrans Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. First Keystone Consultants, Inc. v. Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Amnex, Inc. v. RowlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Kanciper v. Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Application of HörlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API