Legal Opinion

State v. Dull

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 2000No. AC 20357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DALY, J.

The defendant, Nathan Dull, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial by a three judge panel,1 of murder in violation of General *581Statutes § 53a-54a.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that he failed to establish as an affirmative defense that he lacked substantial capacity due to a mental disease or defect to appreciate or control his wrongful conduct,3 (2) violated his due process rights by failing to require the state to disprove his insanity defense4 beyond a reasonable doubt and (3) denied his motion for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. QuinetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dull v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Dull v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Dull v. Commissioner of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API