State v. Rodriguez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The defendant, Josué Rodriguez, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. The defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence for the court to find by a preponderance of the evidence that he had violated the terms of his probation and (2) the court abused its discretion in revoking his probation and sentencing him to twelve years imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. In 2005, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. TDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Santos T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Rodriguez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016