Legal Opinion

Dull v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 1, 2006No. AC 27109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Nathan Dull, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

*788The facts of the underlying criminal case are set out in States. Dull, 59 Conn. App. 579, 757 A.2d 1194 (2000), in which this court affirmed the petitioner’s conviction of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a after a trial to a panel of three judges. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nieves v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. DullConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dull v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Dull v. Commissioner of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API