Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Arthur
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1956No. Civ. 21841PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to establish a Nevada decree of divorce as a judgment of this state and to enforce defendant’s obligations thereunder and under a property settlement agreement.
The parties were married in 1936. They have two children. They separated in early 1946. On February 18, 1946, they entered into a property settlement agreement. The material parts of the agreement are these:
“The wife shall have the permanent and exclusive custody, care, maintenance and education of the children during their respective minorities. ...
“The husband during his lifetime shall provide…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Foust v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Dimarco v. DimarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Swanson v. SwansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.