Foust v. Foust
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Defendant appeals from an order quashing execution and restraining the sheriff from selling plaintiff’s property. The only question to be determined is whether a property settlement agreement had been so merged into an annulment decree that its provision for monthly payments became an operative part thereof, enforceable by execution. The trial court held that it had not but the record does not sustain its ruling.
The parties separated 14 years after their marriage. Plaintiff husband then commenced this action for “annulment of marriage and determination of property rights.” Defendant wife…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Rosin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Kelley v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.