Legal Opinion

Roskind v. Elterman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 7, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This was an action to recover on two notes and interest, $52, being the balance of the premium on an insurance policy issued to Herbert Roskind, a minor son of plaintiff in error. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace and appealed to the circuit court, where it was tried by the judge without a jury, and resulted in a judgment against the defendant below. The trial court overruled, a motion for a new trial, • and the defendant below has appealed in error to this court and has assigned two errors, as follows: The trial court erred.

1. Because no presentment or demand for payment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mercantile Bank of Memphis v. BusbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Cotton Oil Co. v. ShamblinTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. First Nat. Bank v. BarbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commerce Union Bank v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Nees v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API