Cotton Oil Co. v. Shamblin
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Floyd Estill, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.
This action was instituted to recover damages for personal injuries received by the intestate of the defendant in error, while engaged in the service of the plaintiff in error, from the effect of which, it is alleged, he subsequently died. Upon an issue raised by the plea of “not guilty,” the case was heard, the trial resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff below for $5,000. The record is before us on assignments of error to the action of the lower Court.
The declaration filed in the cause is in the words and figures following, viz.: “The plaintiff, Gr. W. Shamblin, administrator of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- East Tennessee Coal Co. v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Harrison v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Searle v. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ruth v. RuthTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Chattanooga Station Co. v. HarperTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Williams v. American Plan Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Rhoton v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
- Elkin Motor Co. v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.