Legal Opinion

Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County.— Hon. A. B. Neil, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Upon a petition alleging illegal assessment of its property, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway prayed and obtained writs of certiorari and supersedeas, and the action of the Railroad and Public Utilities Commission and the board of equalization in making the assessment was reviewed in the circuit court of Davidson county. •

In obedience to the command of the writ of certiorari it was the duty of the board to make a transcript of the proceedings, and transmit it as the return to the writ, SO' *678as to bring before the reviewing court a complete record of the proceedings, including the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rogers v. ColvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Railroad v. EgertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Tennessee Central Railroad v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Robert Fahey v. Fabien Eldridge & Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gatlinburg Beer Regulation Committee v. OgleTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Grace v. CurleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  4. Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rhoton v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API