Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Miners & Merchants Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1942No. Civil No. 4472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— Miners and Merchants Bank, a corporation, plaintiff, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the board of supervisors of Yuma county, called the supervisors, and the board of directors of the Gila Valley Power District, called the directors, seeking to compel them to include in the budget of the district certain items. An alternative writ was issued and after a motion to quash and dismiss the petition was denied, the case was heard on its merits before the court without a jury, after which the alternative writ was made peremptory, and this appeal was taken.

The factual situation on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Brumley v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  3. State of Arizona v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miners & Merchants Bank v. HerronArizona Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Maricopa County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Fay v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hallenbeck v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stephens v. ThomassonArizona Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API