Legal Opinion

Fay v. Harris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1945No. 4752PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case raises questions largely pertaining to procedure. The facts are: Plaintiff-appellee secured a judgment against defendant-appellant on January 30, 1935, in the superior court of Maricopa County. Partial recoveries were made under various executions. On December 11, 1939, affidavit for a renewal of judgment was filed by plaintiff, pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 22, sections 22-101, and 22-102, ACA 1939. The affidavit referre'd' to the judgment as being docketed’ in “Book 20 of Judgments at page F”. The amount of the original judgment and all payments were properly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. J. H. Mulrein Plumbing Supply Co. v. WalshArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Arizona Mutual Auto Insurance v. Bisbee Auto Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Miners & Merchants BankArizona Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. JC Penney v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Stanger v. Sentinel Security Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Weltsch v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Midyett v. Rennat Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API