Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, J udge
Krste Prentoski ("Prentoski") filed an application for change of condition, which was dismissed by the Worker's Compensation Board ("the Board") after the Board determined that his application was filed outside the one-year statute of limitations established in Indiana Code section 22-3-3-27(c). Prentoski appeals and raises two issues which we reorder and restate as:
I. ' Whether the Board erred when it dismissed Prentoski's application because the single hearing member failed to hold a hearing on the motion to dismiss; and,
IL. Whether the Board erred when it dismissed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Evelyn S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Gregg v. Sun Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Halteman Swim Club v. DuguidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Berry v. Anaconda Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pedigo v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Colburn v. Kessler's Team SportsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fitzgerald v. U.S. SteelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Stump Home Specialties Manufacturing v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.