Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A Single Hearing Member of the Worker's Compensation Board dismissed Krste Prentoski's second application for adjustment of benefits after finding it untimely under Indiana Code Section 22-8-8-27(c). That subsection provides, "[Alpplications for increased permanent partial impairment are barred unless filed within one (1) year from the last day for which compensation was paid[.]" Ind.Code § 22-3-3-27(c) (emphasis added). The Full Board affirmed. Later, the Court of Appeals affirmed after agreeing the application was untimely because it was not filed within one year after the last date for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gregg v. Sun Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Luz v. Hart Schaffner & MarxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Halteman Swim Club v. DuguidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Berry v. Anaconda Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lambert v. PowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. Ex Rel. Struyf v. Second Injury FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Fitzgerald v. U.S. SteelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stump Home Specialties Manufacturing v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kohlmeyer v. Second Injury FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008