Berry v. Anaconda Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-appellant, Marvin F. Berry (Berry), appeals the denial by the Worker’s Compensation Board (the Board) of his application for review of award wherein he requested additional medical services and supplies.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On January 25, 1984, Berry was employed by the defendant-appellee, Anaconda Corporation (Anaconda). While acting in the course of his employment, Berry was struck by a forklift truck which caused a spool of wire weighing approximately 3,700 pounds to fall on his body. Berry sustained numerous injuries, including, but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregg v. Sun Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bagwell v. Chrysler CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Luker v. Starcraft Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Halteman Swim Club v. DuguidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Eads v. Perry Township Fire Dept.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Colburn v. Kessler's Team SportsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fitzgerald v. U.S. SteelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.