Gleason v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The sole issue presented is whether the application of R.C. 4141.312 and the restrictions within the Federal Act would reduce appellee’s unemployment compensation by the amount of disability retirement benefits that he received. The record before us demonstrates that the benefits which appellee received from PERS consisted of sums he paid into the fund as part of the payroll deductions, and not those paid by his employer. The court of appeals held that the portion of the pension fund representing an employee’s contribution cannot be offset against an award for unemployment compensation.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lawrence Cabais v. Roscoe Egger, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Rivera v. BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Cicchella v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Independence v. VenturaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Vaught v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Cicchella v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.