Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The central question posed by this appeal is whether the term “income,” as used in R.C. 4141.30(E)(2), includes Social Security disability benefits. We hold that it does not.
Under the unemployment compensation system adopted in Ohio, an individual eligible for such compensation may receive additional benefit amounts if he has a dependent or dependents. R.C. 4141.30(B). The term “dependent,” as relevant herein, is defined in R.C. 4141.30(E)(2), as follows:
“The legally married wife or husband of the individual claiming benefits for whom more than one-half the cost of support has been supplied…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Gleason v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rhodes v. City of New PhiladelphiaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ChappellOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Great Lakes Bar Control, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Davis v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.