Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1998No. SC 15799PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*158 Opinion

PALMER, J.

Under General Statutes § 31-293 (a),1 an employer who has paid workers’ compensation benefits to an employee for injuries sustained by the employee *159as a result of the tortious conduct of a third party may seek reimbursement for those payments by intervening in the employee’s action against the tortfeasor within thirty days of receipt of formal notice of the employee’s action. The sole issue presented by this certified appeal is whether a statute of limitations defense may be raised against an employer who, under § 31-293 (a), intervenes in an employee’s timely filed action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. New Haven Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Goodyear v. DiscalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. American Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mulcahy v. MossaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API