Legal Opinion

Hoefflin v. Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 14, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Third Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Claiming that he entered into a contract with the defendant to fill defendant’s lot and to dig a cistern thereon for the sum of $1,307.00, and that he had performed services under the contract of the value of $1,200.00 when defendant stopped him from work, and that no part thereof had been paid except the sum of $200.00, plaintiff, Walter Wilkerson, brought this suit against the defendant, W. C. Hoefflin, to recover the sum of $1,007.00, the balance due for work performed under the contract. Defendant denied the allegations of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langstaff-Orm Manufacturing Co. v. WilfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Stearns Lumber Co. v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Foster v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. FooteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Columbian Fuel Corporation v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Thomas M. Dieterle v. C. M. (Bill) Gatton, Eldred Neubauer, William R. Jagoe, Iii, Wells T. Lovett, and Frank HartzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. United Mercantile Agencies v. Silver Fleet Motor Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
  5. Evans v. Barbourville Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API