Legal Opinion

Langstaff-Orm Manufacturing Co. v. Wilford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 6, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ballard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

Defendant, Langstaff-Qrm Manufacturing Company, purchased of one Bradford a quantity of cypress timber. At the same time it .contracted with plaintiff, J. L. Wilford, to haul, cut and load the timber on board the cars of the Illinois Central Railroad Company at Crice’s Spur, and agreed to pay plaintiff at the rate of $5 a thousand feet. Plaintiff shipped to defendant about 22,600 feet of lumber. Defendant declined to pay plaintiff for the lumber so shipped, and claimed that plaintiff had violated the contract, and refused to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Komanetsky v. Missouri State Medical AssociationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Columbus Mining Company v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. R. Burleigh & Sons v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Hoefflin v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. HemlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API