Legal Opinion
Berger v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1979No. 78 Civ. 5884 (CHT)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this removed personal injury action, defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. and Goodyear Service Stores (together re*115ferred to as “Goodyear”) move pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) for an order striking plaintiff Berger’s demand for a trial by jury on the ground that she waived her right to a jury trial by failing timely to serve such a demand. Berger cross-moves pursuant to Rule 39(b) for discretionary relief granting her a jury trial. For the reasons given below, Goodyear’s motion is denied and Berger’s motion is granted.
Ba…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Chemical Bank v. 1364 Dean Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Leve v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NYDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Harthan v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Flagstaff Foodservice Corp. v. Consolidated Foods Corp. (In re Flagstaff Foodservice Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Van Zandt v. Uniroyal, Inc., Peerless Tire Div.District Court, W.D. New York · 1982