Legal Opinion

Van Zandt v. Uniroyal, Inc., Peerless Tire Div.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1982No. CIV-81-211B(C)Published

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

Currently before the court in this personal injury and product liability action is plaintiff’s motion requesting that a jury trial be granted pursuant to Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant opposes the motion.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a demand for a jury trial must be made within 10 days “after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue.” Rule 38(b). Pursuant to Rule 39(b), a district court retains the power to order a trial

by jury despite a party’s failure to make a demand. In this circuit, however, the court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Leve v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Berger v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API