Legal Opinion

Flagstaff Foodservice Corp. v. Consolidated Foods Corp. (In re Flagstaff Foodservice Corp.)

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 23, 1982No. Reorganization No. 81-B-11430 (PBA); Adv. No. 81-5562-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION • TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ JURY DEMAND

PRUDENCE B. ABRAM, Bankruptcy Judge.

The defendants in this adversary proceeding have moved to strike plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial as untimely. Plaintiffs have urged in their cross-motion that this Court grant their request, if untimely, as a matter of discretion. For the reasons discussed below, the Court has determined that it should not strike the jury trial demand and should exercise its discretion to permit the late demand.

The facts are as follows: On September 1, 1981 this adversary proceeding was commenced by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Bereslavsky v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API