Legal Opinion

Baum v. Canter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 24, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter comes before the court on motion for an order striking out the bill of complaint on the ground that the bill fails to state an equitable cause of action.

The bill is for the specific performance of a contract dated September 9th, 1927, between the complainants and defendant, whereby the complainants agreed to convey to the defendant the lands and premises described in said bill, by deed of full covenant and warranty, on or before October 10th, 1927 (which was continued to October 24th, 1927), in consideration of the sum of $225. The bill recites that the complainants have always…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kohlrepp v. RamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  2. Doutney v. LambieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Havens v. Sea Shore Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  4. Meeks v. BickfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. The Riverton Country Club v. ThomasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API