Havens v. Sea Shore Land Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
This is a partition suit. The title to one of the tracts which the complainants seek to have divided is in dispute. The defendant asserts title to the whole tract; the complainants, on the other hand, assert a title to the undivided half of it, but admit that the defendant has title to an undivided fourth and that the title to *367the other undivided fourth is in certain other persons. The defendant exhibits a paper title to the whole tract; the important question, therefore, presented for decision is, is the title exhibited by the defendant valid ? for if it is, the bill as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barr v. Gratz's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Jackson ex dem. Hudson v. AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Willson v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Coulson v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- The Riverton Country Club v. ThomasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Freeman v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Jefferson v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.