Legal Opinion

Beech Mountain Property Owners' Ass'n v. Current

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 7724DC101PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The substantive question raised on this appeal is whether the restrictions referred to above are enforceable. However, it is elementary that the substantive issues cannot be considered unless the party raising them has the capacity to do so. Bailey v. Light Co., 212 N.C. 768, 195 S.E. 64 (1938). Thus, the defendants’ challenge to the plaintiff’s standing to assert the claims herein demands our immediate attention.

Our Supreme Court has recognized on numerous occasions the general rule that “[a] restriction which is merely a personal covenant with the grantor does not run with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Reed v. ElmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Sedberry v. ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Willowmere Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Hous.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. PALM PT. PROPERTY OWNERS' v. PisarskiSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. LAUREL PARK VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API