Legal Opinion

TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 535PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant’s pleas in bar of res judicata (Sanderson v. Ins. Co., 218 N.C. 270, 10 S.E. 2d 802), and of estoppel by judgment (Bank v. Evans, 191 N.C. 535, 132 S.E. 563) go to plaintiff’s entire cause of action, and if sustained, will destroy it.

■ When a former judgment is set up as a bar or estoppel, the question is whether the former adjudication was on the merits of the action, and whether there is such an identity of the parties and of the subject matter in the two actions, and whether the merits of the second action are identically the same, as will support a plea of res judicata. Hayes v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Macan v. Scandinavia Belting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Philadelphia Auburn-Cord Co. v. ShockcorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Board of Transportation v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Williams v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API