Legal Opinion

Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 7826SC1106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendants’ contention that plaintiffs’ action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations is without merit. Plaintiffs filed suit to enforce a restrictive covenant. A restrictive covenant is a servitude, commonly referred to as a negative easement, Craven County v. Trust Co., 237 N.C. 502, 75 S.E. 2d 620 (1953), and an easement is an incorporeal hereditament. Davis v. Robinson, 189 N.C. 589, 127 S.E. 697 (1925). G.S. 1-50(3) requires that an action for injury to any incorporeal hereditament be brought within six years. Plaintiffs’ action was clearly brought within this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCrann v. Pinehurst, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Allen v. Sea Gate Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API