Arnold v. May Department Stores Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
'Plaintiff sued to recover for injury, resulting from dermatitis, alleged to have been caused from a hair dye called Notox, applied by an operator of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $12,500. Motion for new trial was filed, but was overruled on condition that a remittitur of $3000 be made, which was done, and judgment went for plaintiff for $9500, and defendant appealed.
The petition charges upon five grounds of negligence, viz.: (1) That defendant knew, or by the exercise of ordinary care, could have known, from the information given to defendant by plaintiff, that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Furnish v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Kleinlein v. FoskinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Flynn v. Bedell Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Dorman v. East St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Zesch v. the Abrasive Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Braun v. Roux Distributing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.