Legal Opinion

Arnold v. May Department Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1935PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

'Plaintiff sued to recover for injury, resulting from dermatitis, alleged to have been caused from a hair dye called Notox, applied by an operator of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $12,500. Motion for new trial was filed, but was overruled on condition that a remittitur of $3000 be made, which was done, and judgment went for plaintiff for $9500, and defendant appealed.

The petition charges upon five grounds of negligence, viz.: (1) That defendant knew, or by the exercise of ordinary care, could have known, from the information given to defendant by plaintiff, that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Furnish v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kleinlein v. FoskinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Flynn v. Bedell Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Dorman v. East St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Zesch v. the Abrasive Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Braun v. Roux Distributing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API