Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Bedell Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1922PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

The injuries to the plaintiff’s face, neck and body, in the nature of a skin disease, were alleged to be due to poisonous or noxious substances, transmitted from the dyed fur collar on a coat purchased by her from the defendant in December, 1917. The case was submitted to the jury on the count in contract; and there was no motion for a directed verdict. The defendant made twelve requests for rulings, but has [argued on its brief only those numbered 4, 6 and 11, and we treat the others as waived. The main question argued is that founded on the judge’s refusal to give the sixth and eleventh…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Farrell v. Manhattan Market Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Barker v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Idzykowski v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API