Legal Opinion
Manke Lumber Co. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 17, 2002No. 26580-0-IIPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
— Manke Lumber Company, Inc., and Warren Posten, Sr. appeal from a superior court decision affirming a Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board determination that Kitsap County’s Comprehensive Plan land designations complied with the Growth Management Act. We affirm.
I. FACTS
A. Background
This appeal involves Kitsap County’s (the County) third attempt to comply with the Growth Management Act (GMA). The County’s two previous attempts resulted in invalidation of its Comprehensive Plan. In the County’s first attempt at complying with the GMA, the Central Puget Sound Growth Management…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brinnon Group v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Davidson Serles & Associates v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Suquamish Tribe v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUNDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Suquamish Tribe v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.