Legal Opinion
Suquamish Tribe v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 7, 2010No. 39017-5-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 P.3d 812 (2010)
The SUQUAMISH TRIBE, Kitsap Citizens for Rural Preservation, Jerry Harless, and The Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Appellants,
v.
CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, State Agency Respondent,
Additional Party from underlying Agency Case: Kitsap County, Respondent.
No. 39017-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
July 7, 2010.
Melody L. Allen, Suquamish Tribe, Office of Tribal Attorney, Suquamish, WA, David Alan Bricklin, Bricklin & Newman, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Jerry Harless, Port Orchard, WA, pro se.
Shelley E. Kneip, Lisa J. Nickel, Kitsap…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brinnon Group v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Brinnon Group v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- BRINNON GROUP v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Rachelle Honeycutt & Gabriel Westergreen v. Phillips 66 CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Burbank Irrigation District 4 v. Dep't Of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.