Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Piggly Wiggly of SF

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1936No. Civ. 9649PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNUTT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff transacted a linen supply business furnishing to Piggly Wiggly stores, among others, laundry service and garments worn by employees. In 1925 the business relation of the parties commenced and it continued up to about June of 1927, when the defendant discontinued it. An employee of plaintiff called at the office of defendant to ascertain why plaintiff was no longer receiving patronage, with the final result that defendant and plaintiff entered into a contract which is the basis of this suit.

“San Francisco, December 31, 1927.
“Pacific Linen Supply Company (supplier)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McKay v. HedgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Tietke v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. McCartney v. Clover Valley Land & Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. Boggs v. Lakeport Agricultural Park Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Oakland California Towel Co. v. SivilsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Rosenblum v. New York Central R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. West Coast Winery, Inc. v. Golden West Wineries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Olcese v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API