Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast European Conference and Its Member Lines v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1976No. 74-2509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALFRED T. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

The Pacific Coast European Conference (PCEC) petitions for relief from a cease- and-desist order of the Federal Maritime Commission entered under the Commission’s statutory authority to regulate transportation rates.

The controversy arises out of the sale of cotton in 1972 to a purchaser in Spain. Spanish law apparently required the purchaser to ship the cotton on Spanish vessels. The exporters accordingly sold the cotton f. o. b. a Pacific port and title passed to the purchaser who then caused the cargo to be shipped on a Spanish carrier.

The PCEC is a shipping…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pacific Coast European Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Pacific Coast European Conference v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Pacific Coast European ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Trans-Pacific Freight Conference Of Japan v. Federal Maritime BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A/S Ivarans Rederi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Takazato v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. A/S Ivarans Rederi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. Takazato v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API