Legal Opinion
Takazato v. Federal Maritime Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1980No. 78-2193PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Kanematsu-Gosho (U.S.A.), Inc., and its former president, Ryoichi Takazato, [collectively, “Kanematsu-Gosho”] brought this action to set aside subpoenas issued by the Federal Maritime Commission requiring Kanematsu-Gosho to produce documentary evidence. The Commission counterclaimed for enforcement of the subpoenas. The district court granted summary judgment for the Commission, ordering enforcement of the subpoenas. Kanematsu-Gosho appeals.1 The district court has stayed its order pending disposition of the appeal. We affirm.
I
On July 9, 1976, the Commission ordered an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Joseph A. Russ, James Whipple, and the Covelo Indian Community of the Round Valley Indian Reservation, in Intervention and v. Richard E. Wilkins, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Cartage Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Takazato v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980