Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast European Conference v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1965No. Nos. 19237-19239PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

The orders here under review1 are two 2 of twenty-two substantially similar orders issued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to its report entitled The Dual Rate Cases.

The orders are here attacked as in excess of the Commission’s authority as bestowed by § 14b of the Shipping Act of 1916, as amended 46 U.S.C. § 813a (Supp. V, 1964) 3 (later discussed), and *200contrary to the intent of that section; and, through lack of notice and hearing, as in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 237 (1946), 5 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1011 (1958).

Petitioners are three of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company Limited, Canadian Occidental Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. State v. PeschonMontana Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Alcaraz v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. California Citizens Band Accociation, Incorporated, a Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API