Legal Opinion
Takazato v. Federal Maritime Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1980No. 78-2193PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
633 F.2d 1276
Ryoichi TAKAZATO; Kanematsu-Gosho (U.S.A.), Inc.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION; Karl E. Bakke, Individually and
as Chairman of the Federal Maritime Commission; and James K.
Cooper, Individually and as the Federal Maritime
Commission's Investigative Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 78-2193.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 1979.
Decided Oct. 16, 1980.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1980.
Richard C. Brautigam, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for plaintiffs-appellants; J. Thomas Rosch, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Joseph A. Russ, James Whipple, and the Covelo Indian Community of the Round Valley Indian Reservation, in Intervention and v. Richard E. Wilkins, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Cartage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986