Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District v. Carnie
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE, Judge.
Petitioner filed a condemnation action pursuant to § 38 — 1—101, et seq., C.R.S.1973, alleging that respondents owned certain land across which petitioner sought to condemn an easement for a sewer line. Peti*1009tioner now appeals, as excessive, the award granting respondents $1,287.50 for the value of the easement. We affirm.
Petitioner’s contention on appeal is that the sewer line in question had been installed across respondents’ property prior to 1973 when respondents purchased the property, and that since the line was in place when respondents acquired the property, it should only…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Brooks Investment Co. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Cox Enterprises, Ltd. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Platte River Power Authority v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gifford v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gilpin Investment Co. v. BlakeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Direct Mail Services, Inc. v. State of Colo.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.