Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Graves v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 1, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The refusal to dismiss the action will not be disturbed on appeal (Griffin v. Bank, 205 N. C., 253, 171 S. E., 71), but there was error in ordering a compulsory reference without first disposing of the pleas in bar. C. S., 573; Garland v. Arrowood, 172 N. C., 591, 90 S. E., 766; Jones v. Wooten, 137 N. C., 421, 49 S. E., 915; Royster v. Wright, 118 N. C., 152, 24 S. E., 746. Error in this respect is confessed by appellee.

Error.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royster v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Jones v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Griffin v. Bank of ColeridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Garland v. . ArrowoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Manufacturers & Jobbers Finance Corp. v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Grady v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API