Legal Opinion

Manufacturers & Jobbers Finance Corp. v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

The pleadings in this case themselves fill perhaps eighty of the ninety-one pages of the record. Space forbids detailed analysis, hut the foregoing summary is sufficient for an understanding of this appeal and the grounds upon which decision is based.(1) The exception to the order referred to by the defendant as enlarging the scope'of the receivership cannot he sustained. The allegations of the complaint were sufficient to put it within the discretion of the court *194to order tbe documents in question turned over to tbe receiver in tbe first place, if, indeed, tbe original order of tbe court did…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Smith v. French.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Burton v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Farmers Gin Company v. WardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pimentel v. HoukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API