Legal Opinion

Betts v. Tom Wade Gin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

The sole issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the plaintiff-appellant should be required to tender to the court the money received pursuant to a settlement agreement as a condition precedent to an order setting aside that agreement. Because we now hold that tender is not required in cases such as this, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand the matter for further proceedings.

This dispute arose as a result of severe injuries received by James Betts while working as a ginner at the Tom Wade Gin on November 26, 1988. Betts’s hands became…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hanover Insurance Company v. HaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Texas Employers Insurance v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Counts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Presley v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Public UtilitiesTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Diane West v. Shelby County Healthcare Corporation d/b/a Reginal Medical Center at MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Perry v. Sentry Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API