Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bauder

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1998No. 0079-97PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Opinion of the Court · MansfieldMansfield, Judge

OVERSTREET, MEYERS, PRICE, HOLLAND and WOMACK, JJ., joined.

We granted discretionary review of this case to determine whether the Fourth Court of Appeals applied the correct standard of law in determining the double jeopardy provisions of the Texas Constitution do not bar re-trial of Appellant’s case.

Appellant is charged with driving while intoxicated. Appellant’s second trial1 ended in a mistrial after the prosecutor adduced testimony from the arresting officer that, immediately prior to Appellant’s arrest, Appellant was engaged in extraneous misconduct.…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by85 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Benitez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Pierson, Leonard Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API