Legal Opinion
Jones v. Goldberger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 1958No. 37555PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an action to recover the down payment of $2,500 on a contract to purchase a flower business. The action is based upon the seller’s alleged fraud. The suit was instituted by one of the buyers, Norman V. Jones, against the seller, Harry Gold-berger, and the other buyer, Ted Smart, was joined as a party defendant. The defendant Goldberger cross-petitioned against both buyers for $4,000, the unpaid balance of the purchase price. The issues and pleadings are such that we may and shall for convenience refer to both buyers as plaintiffs and the seller as defendant.
The case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Viking Refrigerators, Inc. v. Mc-MeachinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Jeter v. De GraffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- O'Quinn v. NothaffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Sarber v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. GoingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.