O'Quinn v. Nothaff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by W. -C. Nothaff against J. W. O’Quinn and C. D. Acord for possession -of mie Dodge automobile and damages. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
W. C. Nothaff, as plaintiff, commenced this action in the district court of -Stephens county, on the 27th day of April, 1917, against J. W. O’Quinn and C. D. Acord, as defendants, for the possession of one Dodge automobile, or its value in the sum of $750, and damages in the amount of $100.
The defendants answered, denying the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition. A jury trial of ,the cause was had on the 9th day of October, 1918, which resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants. Upon the verdict of the jury the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Rogers v. MeiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Howard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Jones v. GoldbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.